Advisor / Can it run? / Gemma 4 26B-A4B on RTX 5090 32GB

Can RTX 5090 32GB run Gemma 4 26B-A4B?

Measured results for Gemma 4 26B-A4B (25.81B MoE, 3.8B active) on RTX 5090 32GB, plus what fits and the commands to run it.

217.5generation tok/s (Q8_0 on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation)
11322prompt tok/s (pp512)
27.4 GBQ8_0 + 16k f16 KV, fits fully
31 GBusable on this hardware

Short answer

Yes. Gemma 4 26B-A4B Q8_0 fits fully on RTX 5090 32GB at 16k context, using 27.4 of 31.0 GB usable, and generates about 217.5 tokens/s in our own run. As the context fills it slows down: 201.7 tok/s with 16k tokens already in context (93% of the empty-context speed), measured. For Q8_0, our bandwidth-only estimate was ~249 tok/s against a measured median of ~217 (15% too optimistic).

Measured generation speed by quantization

QuantGeneration tok/sRangePrompt tok/sRunsOrigin
Q4 class (median)231.4231.4–231.4114321includes our runs
Q8 class (median)217.5217.5–217.5113221includes our runs
Q4_K_M (our run, depth 0)231.43 repeats114323own measurement
Q8_0 (our run, depth 0)217.53 repeats113223own measurement

Generation = tg128 (128 generated tokens, short context). Public rows are medians of community llama.cpp results (sources); our own runs use llama-bench b11658 on a rented GPU.

Speed vs context depth measured

Our own llama-bench runs on GeForce RTX 5090 (flash attention on, 3 repeats): generation and prompt speed with the given number of tokens already in the context.

QuantContext depthGeneration tok/svs depth 0Prompt tok/s
Q4_K_M0231.4100%11432
Q4_K_M4k216.494%10289
Q4_K_M16k21392%9262
Q8_00217.5100%11322
Q8_04k204.594%10335
Q8_016k201.793%9258

Alternatives

Less memory that still fits Gemma 4 26B-A4B

Smaller memory usually means a cheaper card or Mac (we do not list prices).

Other models on RTX 5090 32GB, similar size

Memory and context limits

Q8_0 weights are 26.9 GB; the 16k f16 KV cache adds 0.55 GB. Largest context that fits in 31.0 GB usable:

KV cache typeMax context
f16128k
q8_0256k
q4_0256k

Native limit 256k. Full KV cache table for Gemma 4 26B-A4B.

Copy-paste commands

The advisor's pick for this hardware: Q8_0, 16k context.

llama.cpp
llama-server -hf unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:Q8_0 -c 16384 -fa on --jinja -ngl 99
ollama
OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH=16384 ollama serve
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:Q8_0

FAQ

How fast is Gemma 4 26B-A4B on RTX 5090 32GB?

About 217.5 tokens/s for generation (Q8_0 on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation), 11322 tokens/s for prompt processing. Speed drops as the context fills; see the depth table.

How much memory does Gemma 4 26B-A4B need on RTX 5090 32GB?

The advisor's pick, Q8_0, is 26.9 GB of weights plus 0.55 GB of KV cache at 16k context (27.4 GB), against 31.0 GB usable.

Is the Gemma 4 26B-A4B speed on RTX 5090 32GB measured or estimated?

Measured: our own llama-bench run on a rented GeForce RTX 5090, including runs with 4k to 16k tokens already in context.

What can I use instead of RTX 5090 32GB for Gemma 4 26B-A4B?

With less memory, Mac mini M6 32GB (~27 tok/s), MacBook Air M5 32GB (~25 tok/s), AMD RX 7900 XTX 24GB (~148 tok/s) also fit it fully.

What is the maximum context for Gemma 4 26B-A4B on RTX 5090 32GB?

With an f16 KV cache about 128k tokens, 256k with q8_0 and 256k with q4_0, bounded by the model's own limit.

Related

All models on RTX 5090 32GB · Gemma 4 26B-A4B on all hardware · VRAM tier · all measured pages · leaderboard

Compare: RTX 4090 24GB vs RTX 5090 32GB · RTX 3090 24GB vs RTX 5090 32GB · 2x RTX 3090 (48GB total) vs RTX 5090 32GB