Advisor / Can it run? / Qwen3.5 4B on RTX 5090 32GB

Can RTX 5090 32GB run Qwen3.5 4B?

Measured results for Qwen3.5 4B (4.66B dense) on RTX 5090 32GB, plus what fits and the commands to run it.

244.6generation tok/s (Q8_0 on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation)
17193prompt tok/s (pp512)
5.1 GBQ8_0 + 16k f16 KV, fits fully
31 GBusable on this hardware

Short answer

Yes. Qwen3.5 4B Q8_0 fits fully on RTX 5090 32GB at 16k context, using 5.1 of 31.0 GB usable, and generates about 244.6 tokens/s in our own run. As the context fills it slows down: 226.2 tok/s with 16k tokens already in context (92% of the empty-context speed), measured. For Q8_0, our bandwidth-only estimate was ~220 tok/s against a measured median of ~245 (10% too pessimistic).

Measured generation speed by quantization

QuantGeneration tok/sRangePrompt tok/sRunsOrigin
Q4 class (median)313.6313.6–313.6160361includes our runs
Q8 class (median)244.6244.6–244.6171931includes our runs
Q4_K_M (our run, depth 0)313.63 repeats160363own measurement
Q8_0 (our run, depth 0)244.63 repeats171933own measurement

Generation = tg128 (128 generated tokens, short context). Public rows are medians of community llama.cpp results (sources); our own runs use llama-bench b11658 on a rented GPU.

Speed vs context depth measured

Our own llama-bench runs on GeForce RTX 5090 (flash attention on, 3 repeats): generation and prompt speed with the given number of tokens already in the context.

QuantContext depthGeneration tok/svs depth 0Prompt tok/s
Q4_K_M0313.6100%16036
Q4_K_M4k299.696%15709
Q4_K_M16k282.490%13500
Q8_00244.6100%17193
Q8_04k236.597%16764
Q8_016k226.292%14263

Alternatives

Less memory that still fits Qwen3.5 4B

Smaller memory usually means a cheaper card or Mac (we do not list prices).

Other models on RTX 5090 32GB, similar size

Memory and context limits

Q8_0 weights are 4.5 GB; the 16k f16 KV cache adds 0.59 GB. Largest context that fits in 31.0 GB usable:

KV cache typeMax context
f16512k
q8_01M
q4_01M

Native limit 256k, 1.01M with YaRN. Full KV cache table for Qwen3.5 4B.

Copy-paste commands

The advisor's pick for this hardware: Q8_0, 16k context.

llama.cpp
llama-server -hf unsloth/Qwen3.5-4B-GGUF:Q8_0 -c 16384 -fa on --jinja -ngl 99
ollama
OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH=16384 ollama serve
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Qwen3.5-4B-GGUF:Q8_0

FAQ

How fast is Qwen3.5 4B on RTX 5090 32GB?

About 244.6 tokens/s for generation (Q8_0 on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation), 17193 tokens/s for prompt processing. Speed drops as the context fills; see the depth table.

How much memory does Qwen3.5 4B need on RTX 5090 32GB?

The advisor's pick, Q8_0, is 4.5 GB of weights plus 0.59 GB of KV cache at 16k context (5.1 GB), against 31.0 GB usable.

Is the Qwen3.5 4B speed on RTX 5090 32GB measured or estimated?

Measured: our own llama-bench run on a rented GeForce RTX 5090, including runs with 4k to 16k tokens already in context.

What can I use instead of RTX 5090 32GB for Qwen3.5 4B?

With less memory, 8GB VRAM class (RTX 4060 8GB, 32GB RAM) (~51 tok/s), Mac mini / iMac M4 16GB (~24 tok/s), RTX 5070 12GB (~116 tok/s) also fit it fully.

What is the maximum context for Qwen3.5 4B on RTX 5090 32GB?

With an f16 KV cache about 512k tokens, 1M with q8_0 and 1M with q4_0, bounded by the model's own limit.

Related

All models on RTX 5090 32GB · Qwen3.5 4B on all hardware · VRAM tier · all measured pages · leaderboard

Compare: RTX 4090 24GB vs RTX 5090 32GB · RTX 3090 24GB vs RTX 5090 32GB · 2x RTX 3090 (48GB total) vs RTX 5090 32GB