Advisor / Can it run? / Qwen3.8 27B on RTX 3090 24GB

Can RTX 3090 24GB run Qwen3.8 27B?

Measured results for Qwen3.8 27B (27.78B dense) on RTX 3090 24GB, plus what fits and the commands to run it.

42.9generation tok/s (Q4_K_M on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation)
1507prompt tok/s (pp512)
17.7 GBQ4_K_M + 16k f16 KV, fits fully
23 GBusable on this hardware

Short answer

Yes. Qwen3.8 27B Q4_K_M fits fully on RTX 3090 24GB at 16k context, using 17.7 of 23.0 GB usable, and generates about 42.9 tokens/s in our own run. As the context fills it slows down: 40.6 tok/s with 16k tokens already in context (95% of the empty-context speed) and 35.5 tok/s at 64k (83%), measured. For UD-Q5_K_M, our bandwidth-only estimate was ~26 tok/s against a measured median of ~38 (31% too pessimistic).

Measured generation speed by quantization

QuantGeneration tok/sRangePrompt tok/sRunsOrigin
Q4 class (median)42.942.9–42.915071includes our runs
Q6 class (median)33.933.9–33.913601includes our runs
Q4_K_M (our run, depth 0)42.93 repeats15073own measurement
Q6_K (our run, depth 0)33.93 repeats13603own measurement

Generation = tg128 (128 generated tokens, short context). Public rows are medians of community llama.cpp results (sources); our own runs use llama-bench b11658 on a rented GPU.

Speed vs context depth measured

Our own llama-bench runs on GeForce RTX 3090 (flash attention on, 3 repeats): generation and prompt speed with the given number of tokens already in the context.

QuantContext depthGeneration tok/svs depth 0Prompt tok/s
Q4_K_M042.9100%1507
Q4_K_M4k42.499%1438
Q4_K_M16k40.695%1234
Q4_K_M32k38.790%1058
Q4_K_M64k35.583%820
Q6_K033.9100%1360
Q6_K4k33.599%1299
Q6_K16k32.596%1139
Q6_K32k31.292%984

Alternatives

Less memory that still fits Qwen3.8 27B

Smaller memory usually means a cheaper card or Mac (we do not list prices).

Faster for Qwen3.8 27B

Other models on RTX 3090 24GB, similar size

Memory and context limits

UD-Q5_K_M weights are 19.8 GB; the 16k f16 KV cache adds 1.23 GB. Largest context that fits in 23.0 GB usable:

KV cache typeMax context
f1632k
q8_064k
q4_0128k

Native limit 256k, 1M with YaRN. Full KV cache table for Qwen3.8 27B.

Copy-paste commands

The advisor's pick for this hardware: UD-Q5_K_M, 16k context.

llama.cpp
llama-server -hf unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_M -c 16384 -fa on --jinja -ngl 99
ollama
OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH=16384 ollama serve
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_M

FAQ

How fast is Qwen3.8 27B on RTX 3090 24GB?

About 42.9 tokens/s for generation (Q4_K_M on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation), 1507 tokens/s for prompt processing. Speed drops as the context fills; see the depth table.

How much memory does Qwen3.8 27B need on RTX 3090 24GB?

The advisor's pick, UD-Q5_K_M, is 19.8 GB of weights plus 1.23 GB of KV cache at 16k context (21.0 GB), against 23.0 GB usable. The measured Q4_K_M run needs 17.7 GB.

Is the Qwen3.8 27B speed on RTX 3090 24GB measured or estimated?

Measured: our own llama-bench run on a rented GeForce RTX 3090, including runs with 4k to 64k tokens already in context.

What can I use instead of RTX 3090 24GB for Qwen3.8 27B?

With less memory, Mac mini M6 32GB (~6 tok/s), MacBook Air M5 32GB (~6 tok/s) also fit it fully. Faster: RTX 5090 32GB (~53 tok/s), RTX PRO 6000 96GB (~50 tok/s).

What is the maximum context for Qwen3.8 27B on RTX 3090 24GB?

With an f16 KV cache about 32k tokens, 64k with q8_0 and 128k with q4_0, bounded by the model's own limit.

Related

All models on RTX 3090 24GB · Qwen3.8 27B on all hardware · VRAM tier · all measured pages · leaderboard

Compare: RTX 3090 24GB vs RTX 4090 24GB · RTX 3090 24GB vs RTX 5090 32GB · RTX 3090 24GB vs AMD RX 7900 XTX 24GB