Advisor / Can it run? / Qwen3.8 27B on RTX 4090 24GB

Can RTX 4090 24GB run Qwen3.8 27B?

Measured results for Qwen3.8 27B (27.78B dense) on RTX 4090 24GB, plus what fits and the commands to run it.

50.7generation tok/s (Q4_K_M on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation)
3417prompt tok/s (pp512)
17.7 GBQ4_K_M + 16k f16 KV, fits fully
23 GBusable on this hardware

Short answer

Yes. Qwen3.8 27B Q4_K_M fits fully on RTX 4090 24GB at 16k context, using 17.7 of 23.0 GB usable, and generates about 50.7 tokens/s in our own run. As the context fills it slows down: 48 tok/s with 16k tokens already in context (95% of the empty-context speed) and 41.2 tok/s at 64k (81%), measured. For UD-Q5_K_M, our bandwidth-only estimate was ~28 tok/s against a measured median of ~44 (36% too pessimistic).

Measured generation speed by quantization

QuantGeneration tok/sRangePrompt tok/sRunsOrigin
Q4 class (median)50.750.7–50.734171includes our runs
Q6 class (median)39.739.7–39.729961includes our runs
Q4_K_M (our run, depth 0)50.73 repeats34173own measurement
Q6_K (our run, depth 0)39.73 repeats29963own measurement

Generation = tg128 (128 generated tokens, short context). Public rows are medians of community llama.cpp results (sources); our own runs use llama-bench b11658 on a rented GPU.

Speed vs context depth measured

Our own llama-bench runs on GeForce RTX 4090 (flash attention on, 3 repeats): generation and prompt speed with the given number of tokens already in the context.

QuantContext depthGeneration tok/svs depth 0Prompt tok/s
Q4_K_M050.7100%3417
Q4_K_M4k50.199%3334
Q4_K_M16k4895%2962
Q4_K_M32k45.590%2578
Q4_K_M64k41.281%2061
Q6_K039.7100%2996
Q6_K4k39.399%2912
Q6_K16k3896%2626
Q6_K32k36.492%2322

Alternatives

Less memory that still fits Qwen3.8 27B

Smaller memory usually means a cheaper card or Mac (we do not list prices).

Other models on RTX 4090 24GB, similar size

Memory and context limits

UD-Q5_K_M weights are 19.8 GB; the 16k f16 KV cache adds 1.23 GB. Largest context that fits in 23.0 GB usable:

KV cache typeMax context
f1632k
q8_064k
q4_0128k

Native limit 256k, 1M with YaRN. Full KV cache table for Qwen3.8 27B.

Copy-paste commands

The advisor's pick for this hardware: UD-Q5_K_M, 16k context.

llama.cpp
llama-server -hf unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_M -c 16384 -fa on --jinja -ngl 99
ollama
OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH=16384 ollama serve
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_M

FAQ

How fast is Qwen3.8 27B on RTX 4090 24GB?

About 50.7 tokens/s for generation (Q4_K_M on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation), 3417 tokens/s for prompt processing. Speed drops as the context fills; see the depth table.

How much memory does Qwen3.8 27B need on RTX 4090 24GB?

The advisor's pick, UD-Q5_K_M, is 19.8 GB of weights plus 1.23 GB of KV cache at 16k context (21.0 GB), against 23.0 GB usable. The measured Q4_K_M run needs 17.7 GB.

Is the Qwen3.8 27B speed on RTX 4090 24GB measured or estimated?

Measured: our own llama-bench run on a rented GeForce RTX 4090, including runs with 4k to 64k tokens already in context.

What can I use instead of RTX 4090 24GB for Qwen3.8 27B?

With less memory, Mac mini M6 32GB (~6 tok/s), MacBook Air M5 32GB (~6 tok/s) also fit it fully.

What is the maximum context for Qwen3.8 27B on RTX 4090 24GB?

With an f16 KV cache about 32k tokens, 64k with q8_0 and 128k with q4_0, bounded by the model's own limit.

Related

All models on RTX 4090 24GB · Qwen3.8 27B on all hardware · VRAM tier · all measured pages · leaderboard

Compare: RTX 3090 24GB vs RTX 4090 24GB · RTX 4090 24GB vs RTX 5090 32GB · RTX 4090 24GB vs AMD RX 7900 XTX 24GB · RTX 5080 16GB vs RTX 4090 24GB