Advisor / Can it run? / Qwen3-VL 8B on RTX 4090 24GB

Can RTX 4090 24GB run Qwen3-VL 8B?

Measured results for Qwen3-VL 8B (8.77B dense) on RTX 4090 24GB, plus what fits and the commands to run it.

102.3generation tok/s (Q8_0 on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation)
10242prompt tok/s (pp512)
11.1 GBQ8_0 + 16k f16 KV, fits fully
23 GBusable on this hardware

Short answer

Yes. Qwen3-VL 8B Q8_0 fits fully on RTX 4090 24GB at 16k context, using 11.1 of 23.0 GB usable, and generates about 102.3 tokens/s in our own run. As the context fills it slows down: 80.5 tok/s with 16k tokens already in context (79% of the empty-context speed), measured. For Q8_0, our bandwidth-only estimate was ~64 tok/s against a measured median of ~102 (38% too pessimistic).

Measured generation speed by quantization

QuantGeneration tok/sRangePrompt tok/sRunsOrigin
Q4 class (median)158.5158.5–158.5107661includes our runs
Q8 class (median)102.3102.3–102.3102421includes our runs
Q4_K_M (our run, depth 0)158.53 repeats107663own measurement
Q8_0 (our run, depth 0)102.33 repeats102423own measurement

Generation = tg128 (128 generated tokens, short context). Public rows are medians of community llama.cpp results (sources); our own runs use llama-bench b11658 on a rented GPU.

Speed vs context depth measured

Our own llama-bench runs on GeForce RTX 4090 (flash attention on, 3 repeats): generation and prompt speed with the given number of tokens already in the context.

QuantContext depthGeneration tok/svs depth 0Prompt tok/s
Q4_K_M0158.5100%10766
Q4_K_M4k143.190%9686
Q4_K_M16k111.670%6689
Q4_K_M32k87.555%4899
Q4_K_M64k60.438%3108
Q4_K_M128k37.223%1770
Q8_00102.3100%10242
Q8_04k95.794%10121
Q8_016k80.579%6872

Alternatives

Less memory that still fits Qwen3-VL 8B

Smaller memory usually means a cheaper card or Mac (we do not list prices).

Faster for Qwen3-VL 8B

Other models on RTX 4090 24GB, similar size

Memory and context limits

Q8_0 weights are 8.7 GB; the 16k f16 KV cache adds 2.42 GB. Largest context that fits in 23.0 GB usable:

KV cache typeMax context
f1664k
q8_0128k
q4_0256k

Native limit 256k, 1M with YaRN. Full KV cache table for Qwen3-VL 8B.

Copy-paste commands

The advisor's pick for this hardware: Q8_0, 16k context.

llama.cpp
llama-server -hf unsloth/Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct-GGUF:Q8_0 -c 16384 -fa on --jinja -ngl 99
ollama
OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH=16384 ollama serve
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Qwen3-VL-8B-Instruct-GGUF:Q8_0

FAQ

How fast is Qwen3-VL 8B on RTX 4090 24GB?

About 102.3 tokens/s for generation (Q8_0 on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation), 10242 tokens/s for prompt processing. Speed drops as the context fills; see the depth table.

How much memory does Qwen3-VL 8B need on RTX 4090 24GB?

The advisor's pick, Q8_0, is 8.7 GB of weights plus 2.42 GB of KV cache at 16k context (11.1 GB), against 23.0 GB usable.

Is the Qwen3-VL 8B speed on RTX 4090 24GB measured or estimated?

Measured: our own llama-bench run on a rented GeForce RTX 4090, including runs with 4k to 128k tokens already in context.

What can I use instead of RTX 4090 24GB for Qwen3-VL 8B?

With less memory, Mac mini / iMac M4 16GB (~16 tok/s), RTX 5070 12GB (~94 tok/s), RTX 4070 12GB (~71 tok/s) also fit it fully. Faster: RTX 5090 32GB (~167 tok/s), RTX PRO 6000 96GB (~163 tok/s).

What is the maximum context for Qwen3-VL 8B on RTX 4090 24GB?

With an f16 KV cache about 64k tokens, 128k with q8_0 and 256k with q4_0, bounded by the model's own limit.

Related

All models on RTX 4090 24GB · Qwen3-VL 8B on all hardware · VRAM tier · all measured pages · leaderboard

Compare: RTX 3090 24GB vs RTX 4090 24GB · RTX 4090 24GB vs RTX 5090 32GB · RTX 4090 24GB vs AMD RX 7900 XTX 24GB · RTX 5080 16GB vs RTX 4090 24GB