Advisor / Can it run? / Gemma 4 12B on RTX 4090 24GB

Can RTX 4090 24GB run Gemma 4 12B?

Measured results for Gemma 4 12B (11.96B dense) on RTX 4090 24GB, plus what fits and the commands to run it.

64.2generation tok/s (Q8_0 on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation)
6420prompt tok/s (pp512)
13.3 GBQ8_0 + 16k f16 KV, fits fully
23 GBusable on this hardware

Short answer

Yes. Gemma 4 12B Q8_0 fits fully on RTX 4090 24GB at 16k context, using 13.3 of 23.0 GB usable, and generates about 64.2 tokens/s in our own run. As the context fills it slows down: 61.2 tok/s with 16k tokens already in context (95% of the empty-context speed), measured. For Q8_0, our bandwidth-only estimate was ~44 tok/s against a measured median of ~64 (32% too pessimistic).

Measured generation speed by quantization

QuantGeneration tok/sRangePrompt tok/sRunsOrigin
Q4 class (median)102102–10264651includes our runs
Q8 class (median)64.264.2–64.264201includes our runs
Q4_K_M (our run, depth 0)1023 repeats64653own measurement
Q8_0 (our run, depth 0)64.23 repeats64203own measurement

Generation = tg128 (128 generated tokens, short context). Public rows are medians of community llama.cpp results (sources); our own runs use llama-bench b11658 on a rented GPU.

Speed vs context depth measured

Our own llama-bench runs on GeForce RTX 4090 (flash attention on, 3 repeats): generation and prompt speed with the given number of tokens already in the context.

QuantContext depthGeneration tok/svs depth 0Prompt tok/s
Q4_K_M0102100%6465
Q4_K_M4k97.896%6357
Q4_K_M16k94.793%5290
Q4_K_M32k92.991%4507
Q4_K_M64k87.686%3359
Q4_K_M128k7977%2240
Q8_0064.2100%6420
Q8_04k62.597%6535
Q8_016k61.295%5370

Alternatives

Less memory that still fits Gemma 4 12B

Smaller memory usually means a cheaper card or Mac (we do not list prices).

Faster for Gemma 4 12B

Other models on RTX 4090 24GB, similar size

Memory and context limits

Q8_0 weights are 12.7 GB; the 16k f16 KV cache adds 0.60 GB. Largest context that fits in 23.0 GB usable:

KV cache typeMax context
f16256k
q8_0256k
q4_0256k

Native limit 256k. Full KV cache table for Gemma 4 12B.

Copy-paste commands

The advisor's pick for this hardware: Q8_0, 16k context.

llama.cpp
llama-server -hf unsloth/gemma-4-12b-it-GGUF:Q8_0 -c 16384 -fa on --jinja -ngl 99
ollama
OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH=16384 ollama serve
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/gemma-4-12b-it-GGUF:Q8_0

FAQ

How fast is Gemma 4 12B on RTX 4090 24GB?

About 64.2 tokens/s for generation (Q8_0 on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation), 6420 tokens/s for prompt processing. Speed drops as the context fills; see the depth table.

How much memory does Gemma 4 12B need on RTX 4090 24GB?

The advisor's pick, Q8_0, is 12.7 GB of weights plus 0.60 GB of KV cache at 16k context (13.3 GB), against 23.0 GB usable.

Is the Gemma 4 12B speed on RTX 4090 24GB measured or estimated?

Measured: our own llama-bench run on a rented GeForce RTX 4090, including runs with 4k to 128k tokens already in context.

What can I use instead of RTX 4090 24GB for Gemma 4 12B?

With less memory, Mac mini / iMac M4 16GB (~11 tok/s), RTX 5070 12GB (~51 tok/s), RTX 4070 12GB (~43 tok/s) also fit it fully. Faster: RTX 5090 32GB (~104 tok/s), RTX PRO 6000 96GB (~101 tok/s).

What is the maximum context for Gemma 4 12B on RTX 4090 24GB?

With an f16 KV cache about 256k tokens, 256k with q8_0 and 256k with q4_0, bounded by the model's own limit.

Related

All models on RTX 4090 24GB · Gemma 4 12B on all hardware · VRAM tier · all measured pages · leaderboard

Compare: RTX 3090 24GB vs RTX 4090 24GB · RTX 4090 24GB vs RTX 5090 32GB · RTX 4090 24GB vs AMD RX 7900 XTX 24GB · RTX 5080 16GB vs RTX 4090 24GB