Advisor / Can it run? / Gemma 4 12B on RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

Can RTX 5060 Ti 16GB run Gemma 4 12B?

Measured results for Gemma 4 12B (11.96B dense) on RTX 5060 Ti 16GB, plus what fits and the commands to run it.

31generation tok/s (Q8_0 on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation)
2055prompt tok/s (pp512)
13.3 GBQ8_0 + 16k f16 KV, fits fully
15 GBusable on this hardware

Short answer

Yes. Gemma 4 12B Q8_0 fits fully on RTX 5060 Ti 16GB at 16k context, using 13.3 of 15.0 GB usable, and generates about 31 tokens/s in our own run. As the context fills it slows down: 29.6 tok/s with 16k tokens already in context (95% of the empty-context speed), measured. For Q8_0, our bandwidth-only estimate was ~19 tok/s against a measured median of ~31 (37% too pessimistic).

Measured generation speed by quantization

QuantGeneration tok/sRangePrompt tok/sRunsOrigin
Q4 class (median)49.149.1–49.119811includes our runs
Q8 class (median)3131–3120551includes our runs
Q4_K_M (our run, depth 0)49.13 repeats19813own measurement
Q8_0 (our run, depth 0)313 repeats20553own measurement

Generation = tg128 (128 generated tokens, short context). Public rows are medians of community llama.cpp results (sources); our own runs use llama-bench b11658 on a rented GPU.

Speed vs context depth measured

Our own llama-bench runs on GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB (flash attention on, 3 repeats): generation and prompt speed with the given number of tokens already in the context.

QuantContext depthGeneration tok/svs depth 0Prompt tok/s
Q4_K_M049.1100%1981
Q4_K_M4k46.394%1786
Q4_K_M16k45.593%1471
Q8_0031100%2055
Q8_04k29.996%1862
Q8_016k29.695%1537

Alternatives

Less memory that still fits Gemma 4 12B

Smaller memory usually means a cheaper card or Mac (we do not list prices).

Faster for Gemma 4 12B

Other models on RTX 5060 Ti 16GB, similar size

Memory and context limits

Q8_0 weights are 12.7 GB; the 16k f16 KV cache adds 0.60 GB. Largest context that fits in 15.0 GB usable:

KV cache typeMax context
f1664k
q8_0128k
q4_0256k

Native limit 256k. Full KV cache table for Gemma 4 12B.

Copy-paste commands

The advisor's pick for this hardware: Q8_0, 16k context.

llama.cpp
llama-server -hf unsloth/gemma-4-12b-it-GGUF:Q8_0 -c 16384 -fa on --jinja -ngl 99
ollama
OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH=16384 ollama serve
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/gemma-4-12b-it-GGUF:Q8_0

FAQ

How fast is Gemma 4 12B on RTX 5060 Ti 16GB?

About 31 tokens/s for generation (Q8_0 on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation), 2055 tokens/s for prompt processing. Speed drops as the context fills; see the depth table.

How much memory does Gemma 4 12B need on RTX 5060 Ti 16GB?

The advisor's pick, Q8_0, is 12.7 GB of weights plus 0.60 GB of KV cache at 16k context (13.3 GB), against 15.0 GB usable.

Is the Gemma 4 12B speed on RTX 5060 Ti 16GB measured or estimated?

Measured: our own llama-bench run on a rented GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB, including runs with 4k to 16k tokens already in context.

What can I use instead of RTX 5060 Ti 16GB for Gemma 4 12B?

With less memory, Mac mini / iMac M4 16GB (~11 tok/s), RTX 5070 12GB (~51 tok/s), RTX 4070 12GB (~43 tok/s) also fit it fully. Faster: RTX 5080 16GB (~62 tok/s), RTX 5070 Ti 16GB (~58 tok/s), RTX 4090 24GB (~64 tok/s).

What is the maximum context for Gemma 4 12B on RTX 5060 Ti 16GB?

With an f16 KV cache about 64k tokens, 128k with q8_0 and 256k with q4_0, bounded by the model's own limit.

Related

All models on RTX 5060 Ti 16GB · Gemma 4 12B on all hardware · VRAM tier · all measured pages · leaderboard

Compare: RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs 16GB VRAM class (RTX 4060 Ti 16GB, 32GB RAM) · RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 5070 Ti 16GB