Advisor / Compare / RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 5070 Ti 16GB

RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 5070 Ti 16GB for local LLMs

Memory fit, speed and context compared with the same math as the advisor. Both offer about the same usable memory (15.0 GB), so the difference is mostly bandwidth (448 vs 896 GB/s).

10 vs 10models fit fully (of 28) at 16k
15 vs 15 GBusable memory
448 vs 896memory bandwidth, GB/s
x1.8RTX 5070 Ti 16GB typical speed advantage

Verdict from the numbers

Where to check prices

Price tier note

We do not list prices because they move daily and differ between new and used stock. What the data does show is what the memory difference buys: both have the same usable memory, so model fit is identical and the choice comes down to speed (448 vs 896 GB/s bandwidth). Use the Amazon links above to compare current listings and decide whether the difference is worth it for the models you want to run.

Model by model · 16k context, f16 KV cache

ModelRTX 5060 Ti 16GB fittok/sRTX 5070 Ti 16GB fittok/sFaster / fits
Gemma 4 26B-A4B UD-Q4_K_MMoE offload to CPU82 estimatedMoE offload to CPU100 estimated-
Gemma 4 31B Q4_K_Mpartial offload (slow)8 estimatedpartial offload (slow)9 estimated-
Gemma 4 12B Q8_0fits fully31 measuredfits fully58 measuredRTX 5070 Ti 16GB
Qwen3.6 27B Q4_K_Mpartial offload (slow)11 estimatedpartial offload (slow)14 estimated-
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B UD-Q4_K_MMoE offload to CPU66 estimatedMoE offload to CPU71 estimated-
Qwen3.5 9B Q8_0fits fully46 measuredfits fully86 measuredRTX 5070 Ti 16GB
Qwen3.5 4B Q8_0fits fully80 measuredfits fully143 measuredRTX 5070 Ti 16GB
gpt-oss 20B Q8_0fits fully125 measuredfits fully224 measuredRTX 5070 Ti 16GB
gpt-oss 120B does not fit-does not fit--
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Q4_K_MMoE offload to CPU71 estimatedMoE offload to CPU80 estimated-
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Q4_K_Mpartial offload (slow)16 estimatedpartial offload (slow)19 estimated-
Qwen3-VL 8B Q8_0fits fully49 measuredfits fully93 measuredRTX 5070 Ti 16GB
GLM-4.5-Air does not fit-does not fit--
Qwen3.8 27B UD-Q4_K_Mpartial offload (slow)12 estimatedpartial offload (slow)15 estimated-
LFM2.5 24B-A2B Q4_K_Mfits fully180 scaled from measuredfits fully266 scaled from measuredRTX 5070 Ti 16GB
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 120B-A12B does not fit-does not fit--
Gemma 4 E4B Q8_0fits fully52 scaled from measuredfits fully99 scaled from measuredRTX 5070 Ti 16GB
Qwen3.8 Flash Next does not fit-does not fit--
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B-A3B Q4_K_MMoE offload to CPU41 estimatedMoE offload to CPU44 estimated-
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B Q8_0fits fully84 scaled from measuredfits fully152 scaled from measuredRTX 5070 Ti 16GB
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B UD-Q4_K_MMoE offload to CPU45 estimatedMoE offload to CPU49 estimated-
GLM-4.7-Flash Q4_K_MMoE offload to CPU92 estimatedMoE offload to CPU106 estimated-
Ornith 1.5 9B Q8_0fits fully46 scaled from measuredfits fully86 scaled from measuredRTX 5070 Ti 16GB
Ornith 1.5 35B-A3B Q4_K_MMoE offload to CPU69 estimatedMoE offload to CPU76 estimated-
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B Q8_0fits fully53 scaled from measuredfits fully100 scaled from measuredRTX 5070 Ti 16GB
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B Q4_K_Mpartial offload (slow)6 estimatedpartial offload (slow)6 estimated-
Laguna XS 2.1 Q4_K_MMoE offload to CPU72 estimatedMoE offload to CPU79 estimated-
Llama 3.3 70B does not fit-does not fit--

Badges: measured medians of real llama.cpp runs; scaled from measured and estimated come from our bandwidth model. See sources and methods.

How much context fits?

Largest context where weights plus KV cache stay inside usable memory, per model that fits fully on at least one side. q8_0 KV roughly halves the cache.

ModelRTX 5060 Ti 16GB f16RTX 5070 Ti 16GB f16RTX 5060 Ti 16GB q8_0RTX 5070 Ti 16GB q8_0
LFM2.5 24B-A2B16k16k32k32k
gpt-oss 20B64k64k128k128k
Gemma 4 12B64k64k128k128k
Qwen3.5 9B128k128k256k256k
Ornith 1.5 9B128k128k256k256k
Qwen3-VL 8B32k32k64k64k
Gemma 4 E4B128k128k128k128k
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B64k64k128k128k
Qwen3.5 4B256k256k512k512k
Nemotron 3 Nano 4B256k256k256k256k

Spec summary

RTX 5060 Ti 16GBRTX 5070 Ti 16GB
Usable memory for model + KV cache15.0 GB15.0 GB
Memory bandwidth448 GB/s896 GB/s
Models that fit fully at 16k10 of 2810 of 28
Models that need offload or do not fit1818
Measured data points on file1115

FAQ

Which is faster for local LLMs, RTX 5060 Ti 16GB or RTX 5070 Ti 16GB?

On the 10 models that fit fully on both, RTX 5070 Ti 16GB is typically 1.8x faster (geometric mean). RTX 5060 Ti 16GB wins 0 and RTX 5070 Ti 16GB wins 10. 5 comparisons are measured on both.

Which fits more models, RTX 5060 Ti 16GB or RTX 5070 Ti 16GB?

RTX 5060 Ti 16GB fits 10 of 28 models fully at 16k context and RTX 5070 Ti 16GB fits 10.

Can I run long context on RTX 5060 Ti 16GB or RTX 5070 Ti 16GB?

At f16 KV cache, the largest-model context limits are in the table above (for example LFM2.5 24B-A2B on RTX 5060 Ti 16GB: 16k; LFM2.5 24B-A2B on RTX 5070 Ti 16GB: 16k). A q8_0 KV cache extends it further.

Do you state prices for RTX 5060 Ti 16GB or RTX 5070 Ti 16GB?

No. Prices change daily, so we link to Amazon search results instead and focus on measured and estimated speed and memory fit.

Related

RTX 5060 Ti 16GB · RTX 5070 Ti 16GB · Measured model pages: gpt-oss 20B · Mistral Small 3.2 24B · Gemma 4 12B · Qwen3.5 9B · Qwen3-VL 8B · gpt-oss 20B

More comparisons: RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs 16GB VRAM class (RTX 4060 Ti 16GB, 32GB RAM) · RTX 5070 Ti 16GB vs 16GB VRAM class (RTX 4060 Ti 16GB, 32GB RAM) · all comparisons

By memory: 8 GB · 12 GB · 16 GB · 24 GB · 32 GB · 48 GB · 64 GB · 96 GB · 128 GB · 192 GB · 256 GB · 512 GB