Advisor / Can it run? / Qwen3.5 4B on RTX 3090 24GB

Can RTX 3090 24GB run Qwen3.5 4B?

Measured results for Qwen3.5 4B (4.66B dense) on RTX 3090 24GB, plus what fits and the commands to run it.

138generation tok/s (Q8_0 on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation)
7631prompt tok/s (pp512)
5.1 GBQ8_0 + 16k f16 KV, fits fully
23 GBusable on this hardware

Short answer

Yes. Qwen3.5 4B Q8_0 fits fully on RTX 3090 24GB at 16k context, using 5.1 of 23.0 GB usable, and generates about 138 tokens/s in our own run. As the context fills it slows down: 127.6 tok/s with 16k tokens already in context (92% of the empty-context speed), measured. For Q8_0, our bandwidth-only estimate was ~115 tok/s against a measured median of ~138 (17% too pessimistic).

Measured generation speed by quantization

QuantGeneration tok/sRangePrompt tok/sRunsOrigin
Q4 class (median)179.1179.1–179.173661includes our runs
Q8 class (median)138138–13876311includes our runs
Q4_K_M (our run, depth 0)179.13 repeats73663own measurement
Q8_0 (our run, depth 0)1383 repeats76313own measurement

Generation = tg128 (128 generated tokens, short context). Public rows are medians of community llama.cpp results (sources); our own runs use llama-bench b11658 on a rented GPU.

Speed vs context depth measured

Our own llama-bench runs on GeForce RTX 3090 (flash attention on, 3 repeats): generation and prompt speed with the given number of tokens already in the context.

QuantContext depthGeneration tok/svs depth 0Prompt tok/s
Q4_K_M0179.1100%7366
Q4_K_M4k175.998%7162
Q4_K_M16k163.291%5995
Q4_K_M32k14782%4577
Q4_K_M64k123.869%3454
Q4_K_M128k9452%2254
Q8_00138100%7631
Q8_04k135.698%7371
Q8_016k127.692%6232

Alternatives

Less memory that still fits Qwen3.5 4B

Smaller memory usually means a cheaper card or Mac (we do not list prices).

Faster for Qwen3.5 4B

Other models on RTX 3090 24GB, similar size

Memory and context limits

Q8_0 weights are 4.5 GB; the 16k f16 KV cache adds 0.59 GB. Largest context that fits in 23.0 GB usable:

KV cache typeMax context
f16512k
q8_01M
q4_01M

Native limit 256k, 1.01M with YaRN. Full KV cache table for Qwen3.5 4B.

Copy-paste commands

The advisor's pick for this hardware: Q8_0, 16k context.

llama.cpp
llama-server -hf unsloth/Qwen3.5-4B-GGUF:Q8_0 -c 16384 -fa on --jinja -ngl 99
ollama
OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH=16384 ollama serve
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Qwen3.5-4B-GGUF:Q8_0

FAQ

How fast is Qwen3.5 4B on RTX 3090 24GB?

About 138 tokens/s for generation (Q8_0 on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation), 7631 tokens/s for prompt processing. Speed drops as the context fills; see the depth table.

How much memory does Qwen3.5 4B need on RTX 3090 24GB?

The advisor's pick, Q8_0, is 4.5 GB of weights plus 0.59 GB of KV cache at 16k context (5.1 GB), against 23.0 GB usable.

Is the Qwen3.5 4B speed on RTX 3090 24GB measured or estimated?

Measured: our own llama-bench run on a rented GeForce RTX 3090, including runs with 4k to 128k tokens already in context.

What can I use instead of RTX 3090 24GB for Qwen3.5 4B?

With less memory, 8GB VRAM class (RTX 4060 8GB, 32GB RAM) (~51 tok/s), Mac mini / iMac M4 16GB (~24 tok/s), RTX 5070 12GB (~116 tok/s) also fit it fully. Faster: RTX 5090 32GB (~245 tok/s), RTX PRO 6000 96GB (~244 tok/s), Mac Studio M5 Ultra 256GB (~166 tok/s).

What is the maximum context for Qwen3.5 4B on RTX 3090 24GB?

With an f16 KV cache about 512k tokens, 1M with q8_0 and 1M with q4_0, bounded by the model's own limit.

Related

All models on RTX 3090 24GB · Qwen3.5 4B on all hardware · VRAM tier · all measured pages · leaderboard

Compare: RTX 3090 24GB vs RTX 4090 24GB · RTX 3090 24GB vs RTX 5090 32GB · RTX 3090 24GB vs AMD RX 7900 XTX 24GB