Advisor / Can it run? / Qwen3.5 4B on RTX 5070 Ti 16GB

Can RTX 5070 Ti 16GB run Qwen3.5 4B?

Measured results for Qwen3.5 4B (4.66B dense) on RTX 5070 Ti 16GB, plus what fits and the commands to run it.

143.4generation tok/s (Q8_0 on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation)
9400prompt tok/s (pp512)
5.1 GBQ8_0 + 16k f16 KV, fits fully
15 GBusable on this hardware

Short answer

Yes. Qwen3.5 4B Q8_0 fits fully on RTX 5070 Ti 16GB at 16k context, using 5.1 of 15.0 GB usable, and generates about 143.4 tokens/s in our own run. As the context fills it slows down: 131.4 tok/s with 16k tokens already in context (92% of the empty-context speed), measured. For Q8_0, our bandwidth-only estimate was ~110 tok/s against a measured median of ~143 (23% too pessimistic).

Measured generation speed by quantization

QuantGeneration tok/sRangePrompt tok/sRunsOrigin
Q4 class (median)187.6187.6–187.688891includes our runs
Q8 class (median)143.4143.4–143.494001includes our runs
Q4_K_M (our run, depth 0)187.63 repeats88893own measurement
Q8_0 (our run, depth 0)143.43 repeats94003own measurement

Generation = tg128 (128 generated tokens, short context). Public rows are medians of community llama.cpp results (sources); our own runs use llama-bench b11658 on a rented GPU.

Speed vs context depth measured

Our own llama-bench runs on GeForce RTX 5070 Ti (flash attention on, 3 repeats): generation and prompt speed with the given number of tokens already in the context.

QuantContext depthGeneration tok/svs depth 0Prompt tok/s
Q4_K_M0187.6100%8889
Q4_K_M4k179.896%8265
Q4_K_M16k166.889%6592
Q8_00143.4100%9400
Q8_04k139.197%8767
Q8_016k131.492%6870

Alternatives

Less memory that still fits Qwen3.5 4B

Smaller memory usually means a cheaper card or Mac (we do not list prices).

Faster for Qwen3.5 4B

Other models on RTX 5070 Ti 16GB, similar size

Memory and context limits

Q8_0 weights are 4.5 GB; the 16k f16 KV cache adds 0.59 GB. Largest context that fits in 15.0 GB usable:

KV cache typeMax context
f16256k
q8_0512k
q4_01M

Native limit 256k, 1.01M with YaRN. Full KV cache table for Qwen3.5 4B.

Copy-paste commands

The advisor's pick for this hardware: Q8_0, 16k context.

llama.cpp
llama-server -hf unsloth/Qwen3.5-4B-GGUF:Q8_0 -c 16384 -fa on --jinja -ngl 99
ollama
OLLAMA_CONTEXT_LENGTH=16384 ollama serve
ollama run hf.co/unsloth/Qwen3.5-4B-GGUF:Q8_0

FAQ

How fast is Qwen3.5 4B on RTX 5070 Ti 16GB?

About 143.4 tokens/s for generation (Q8_0 on llama.cpp CUDA, 128-token generation), 9400 tokens/s for prompt processing. Speed drops as the context fills; see the depth table.

How much memory does Qwen3.5 4B need on RTX 5070 Ti 16GB?

The advisor's pick, Q8_0, is 4.5 GB of weights plus 0.59 GB of KV cache at 16k context (5.1 GB), against 15.0 GB usable.

Is the Qwen3.5 4B speed on RTX 5070 Ti 16GB measured or estimated?

Measured: our own llama-bench run on a rented GeForce RTX 5070 Ti, including runs with 4k to 16k tokens already in context.

What can I use instead of RTX 5070 Ti 16GB for Qwen3.5 4B?

With less memory, 8GB VRAM class (RTX 4060 8GB, 32GB RAM) (~51 tok/s), Mac mini / iMac M4 16GB (~24 tok/s), RTX 5070 12GB (~116 tok/s) also fit it fully. Faster: RTX 5090 32GB (~245 tok/s), RTX PRO 6000 96GB (~244 tok/s), Mac Studio M5 Ultra 256GB (~166 tok/s).

What is the maximum context for Qwen3.5 4B on RTX 5070 Ti 16GB?

With an f16 KV cache about 256k tokens, 512k with q8_0 and 1M with q4_0, bounded by the model's own limit.

Related

All models on RTX 5070 Ti 16GB · Qwen3.5 4B on all hardware · VRAM tier · all measured pages · leaderboard

Compare: RTX 5070 Ti 16GB vs 16GB VRAM class (RTX 4060 Ti 16GB, 32GB RAM) · RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs RTX 5070 Ti 16GB